DSpace Repository

Handheld Guides in Inspection Tasks: Augmented Reality versus Picture

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Polvi, Jarkko
dc.contributor.author Taketomi, Takafumi
dc.contributor.author Moteki, Atsunori
dc.contributor.author Yoshitake, Toshiyuki
dc.contributor.author Fukuoka, Toshiyuki
dc.contributor.author Yamamoto, Goshiro
dc.contributor.author Sandor, Christian
dc.contributor.author Kato, Hirokazu
dc.date.accessioned 2019-08-29T04:56:46Z
dc.date.available 2019-08-29T04:56:46Z
dc.date.issued 2018-07-01
dc.identifier.issn 1077-2626
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10061/13368
dc.description.abstract Inspection tasks focus on observation of the environment and are required in many industrial domains. Inspectors usually execute these tasks by using a guide such as a paper manual, and directly observing the environment. The effort required to match the information in a guide with the information in an environment and the constant gaze shifts required between the two can severely lower the work efficiency of inspector in performing his/her tasks. Augmented reality (AR) allows the information in a guide to be overlaid directly on an environment. This can decrease the amount of effort required for information matching, thus increasing work efficiency. AR guides on head-mounted displays (HMDs) have been shown to increase efficiency. Handheld AR (HAR) is not as efficient as HMD-AR in terms of manipulability, but is more practical and features better information input and sharing capabilities. In this study, we compared two handheld guides: an AR interface that shows 3D registered annotations, that is, annotations having a fixed 3D position in the AR environment, and a non-AR picture interface that displays non-registered annotations on static images. We focused on inspection tasks that involve high information density and require the user to move, as well as to perform several viewpoint alignments. The results of our comparative evaluation showed that use of the AR interface resulted in lower task completion times, fewer errors, fewer gaze shifts, and a lower subjective workload. We are the first to present findings of a comparative study of an HAR and a picture interface when used in tasks that require the user to move and execute viewpoint alignments, focusing only on direct observation. Our findings can be useful for AR practitioners and psychology researchers. ja_JP
dc.language.iso en ja_JP
dc.publisher IEEE ja_JP
dc.rights © 2018 IEEE. Personal use of this material is permitted. Permission from IEEE must be obtained for all other uses, in any current or future media, including reprinting/republishing this material for advertising or promotional purposes, creating new collective works, for resale or redistribution to servers or lists, or reuse of any copyrighted component of this work in other works. ja_JP
dc.subject Handheld devices ja_JP
dc.subject augmented reality ja_JP
dc.subject user evaluation ja_JP
dc.subject inspection task ja_JP
dc.title Handheld Guides in Inspection Tasks: Augmented Reality versus Picture ja_JP
dc.type.nii Journal Article ja_JP
dc.contributor.transcription タケトミ, タカフミ
dc.contributor.transcription ヤマモト, ゴウシロウ
dc.contributor.transcription カトウ, ヒロカズ
dc.contributor.alternative 武冨, 貴史
dc.contributor.alternative 山本, 豪志朗
dc.contributor.alternative 加藤, 博一
dc.identifier.fulltexturl https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/7935524/keywords#keywords ja_JP
dc.textversion author ja_JP
dc.identifier.jtitle IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics ja_JP
dc.identifier.volume 24 ja_JP
dc.identifier.issue 7 ja_JP
dc.identifier.spage 2118 ja_JP
dc.identifier.epage 2128 ja_JP
dc.relation.doi info:doi/10.1109/TVCG.2017.2709746 ja_JP
dc.identifier.NAIST-ID 73296261 ja_JP
dc.identifier.NAIST-ID 73296683 ja_JP
dc.identifier.NAIST-ID 73292815 ja_JP


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search DSpace


Advanced Search

Browse

My Account